
Angela Rayner brands Mahmood's migration reforms un-British
Angela Rayner brands Mahmood's migration reforms un-British
- Angela Rayner criticized the immigration reforms suggested by Shabana Mahmood, claiming they undermine trust with migrants.
- The proposed changes would extend the time for migrants to obtain permanent residence from five to ten years.
- The criticism has led to a potential Labour revolt, as MPs threaten to force a vote on the reforms.
Story
In the ongoing political turmoil within the Labour Party, Angela Rayner, the former deputy prime minister, voiced strong opposition to Shabana Mahmood's proposed reforms concerning indefinite leave to remain (ILR) for migrants in the UK. The proposals suggest extending the period migrants must wait for permanent residency from five to ten years, a move that has ignited significant disagreement among party members. During a recent event, Rayner emphasized that these changes would breach trust with individuals already residing in the country, labeling the approach as 'un-British' and 'bad policy.' Her remarks have further fueled existing tensions within the party, leading to calls for MPs to potentially force a vote on the matter in Parliament. Despite the backlash, the government maintains that the plans are a key part of their agenda to tighten immigration controls, asserting that this change is necessary to manage the costs to public services and taxpayers responsibly. Although no firm commitment was made in response to Rayner's critique, Downing Street reiterated that they are reviewing the situation. This ongoing discord highlights the divisions within Labour, exposing challenges for party leader Sir Keir Starmer as he attempts to rally support amid declining approval ratings and shifting political landscapes. Rayner's concerns resonate with many Labour MPs, who have expressed a desire to ensure that the party reflects the interests of working people rather than the established elite. The situation remains fluid, as party alignment and member sentiments evolve in the face of these controversial immigration proposals.