The new biopic about Michael Jackson is set to be one of the worst films of 2026. Produced by several of Jackson's relatives and close associates, it leaves out much of the artist's dramatic life and significant controversies. The film chronicles Jackson's rise to fame, detailing his time in the Jackson 5 and his subsequent solo career, but abruptly stops in the mid-1980s, omitting any reference to serious allegations made against him later in life. Critics have described the film as bland, lacking the emotional depth or drive that characterized Jackson's creative work. While the film has drawn attention for its cast, including Jaafar Jackson as Michael and Colman Domingo as his father Joe, the performances have received mixed reviews. Jaafar, primarily recognized for his physical resemblance to Jackson, does not convey the emotional weight of the character, and the writing has been noted for its lack of nuance. Critics have pointed out that the film contains little that is compelling or engaging, resembling a soulless portrayal rather than a comprehensive biography. Despite expectations of a rich family narrative, it's clear that the film was designed to present only the positive aspects of Jackson's life. Reviewers have condemned the film as a ‘whitewash’ and a ‘soulless cash grab’ that avoids addressing allegations of sexual abuse against Jackson. Parts of the narrative have been scrapped due to non-disclosure agreements, leaving audiences and critics frustrated that a film about such a controversial figure could leave out his most infamous allegations. Accusations of abusive behavior during Jackson's later years are notably absent, leading some to label the entire project as lacking integrity and humanity. In the wake of ongoing favorable reception for biopics, the decision to sanitize Jackson's life story has raised questions about the responsibilities of filmmakers when dealing with complex historical figures. The critiques suggest that the film could mark a turning point for the music biopic genre, not serving as an inspiring tribute but instead as a lesson in how not to portray a multi-faceted individual. As the film continues to make its rounds, the reception so far has indicated a significant divide between die-hard fans of Jackson and those who expect a balanced portrayal in biographical films.