politics
controversial
provocative

Jasmine Crockett condemns Trump over Epstein ties after Maxwell's testimony

Feb 9, 2026, 2:26 PM20
(Update: Feb 10, 2026, 10:25 AM)
president of the United States from 2017 to 2021
British socialite and criminal, daughter of Robert Maxwell
American attorney and politician

Jasmine Crockett condemns Trump over Epstein ties after Maxwell's testimony

  • Representative Jasmine Crockett criticized Trump after Ghislaine Maxwell's deposition.
  • Raskin reported documents contradicting Trump's claims about Epstein.
  • Lawmakers are pressing for accountability regarding Epstein's connections.
Share opinion
Tip: Add insight, not just a reaction
2

Story

In the United States, Texas House Democrat Representative Jasmine Crockett reacted strongly against President Donald Trump following Ghislaine Maxwell's closed-door deposition before the House Oversight Committee. During this hearing, Maxwell, who is a convicted accomplice of Jeffrey Epstein, exercised her Fifth Amendment right to refuse to answer questions from lawmakers. Crockett stated, 'We're gonna be on his ass,' emphasizing the need for accountability concerning Trump’s connections to Epstein, who was involved in a child sex-trafficking ring. The comments were made in light of ongoing investigations into Epstein’s widespread criminal activities and his connections to various public figures. Crockett contrasted Trump's handling with the scrutiny faced by former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, asserting that both Clintons were being targeted while Trump was afforded protection. She noted that there appears to be a double standard regarding accountability, where Trump's associations with convicted felons were not being treated with the same severity. This situation has unfolded amidst political tensions surrounding the Epstein investigation, which has seen many high-profile individuals connected to Epstein being questioned. Moreover, Representative Jamie Raskin highlighted unredacted documents from the Epstein files that contradict Trump's claims about having barred Epstein from his Mar-a-Lago club in Florida. These documents reportedly include emails that indicate Epstein was once a guest there, contrary to Trump's assertions. Raskin accused the Department of Justice of unnecessary redactions and a lack of transparency concerning the investigation into Epstein's operations. Public interest remains high regarding Trump's connections since neither he nor Clinton have been formally accused of any wrongdoing related to Epstein's criminal activities despite their names appearing in the released Epstein files. As various congressional figures continue to seek accountability and transparency in this investigation, concerns about the implications for both political parties linger. Democratic lawmakers, including Crockett and Raskin, are keen to ensure thorough scrutiny of all individuals connected to Epstein's crimes, emphasizing that these are issues of right versus wrong, and not simply partisan matters. The handling of depositions and testimonies may significantly influence public discourse as the investigation progresses and more details are revealed concerning the extent of Epstein’s network and the complicity of those connected to him.

2026 All rights reserved