In the United States, Melania Trump's documentary, which follows her experiences leading up to her husband's second inauguration, premiered in selected theaters before its streaming release on Amazon Prime Video on March 9. The film has generated considerable controversy and criticism, with many claiming it serves as a promotional tool for the Trump administration rather than being a genuine documentary. Critics have panned it as a vanity project, referring to it as lacking substantial content, and it has received a notably poor response from reviewers and audiences alike. Despite the disapproving critical reception, the film earned $13.35 million domestically in its initial two weeks at the box office. This performance was bolstered by support from organized groups of Republican women, highlighting a demographic that showed significant interest in the project. However, the film's financial prospects appear grim, as it is unlikely to recoup the massive investment of $40 million made by Amazon MGM studios, coupled with an additional $35 million spent on marketing. Melania Trump announced the film's streaming date, describing it as a significant and record-breaking accomplishment. This claim raised eyebrows among critics who underscored the financial woes the film faces, and many pointed out the discrepancy between the declared success and the prevalent critical reviews marking it as a failure. Supporters and detractors alike took to social media to express their opinions on the film and its implications. The documentary’s premiere events included a lavish black-tie affair held at the White House where VIP guests received themed merchandise, underscoring the connection between the project and the Trump political brand. Directed by Brett Ratner, who faced allegations of misconduct in the past, the film has raised questions not just about Melania Trump's portrayal but about the nature of documentary filmmaking in the context of political narratives.