military conflicts
impactful
controversial

Zelenskyy claims Ukraine eliminated key drone relay installations in Belarus

Feb 23, 2026, 3:16 PM30
(Update: Feb 24, 2026, 6:28 AM)
President of Ukraine since 2019
country in Eastern Europe
country in Eastern Europe
writer
capital and largest city of Belarus

Zelenskyy claims Ukraine eliminated key drone relay installations in Belarus

  • Ukraine has likely destroyed several Shahed drone relay installations in Belarus that have been used to guide attacks on Ukraine.
  • These installations represent new military infrastructure aimed at enhancing the accuracy of Russian drone strikes.
  • Zelenskyy warns that Belarus's military cooperation with Russia poses increasing risks for the country itself.
Share opinion
Tip: Add insight, not just a reaction
3

Story

On February 23, 2026, in a public statement, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy discussed recent military developments regarding drone warfare that have implications beyond Ukraine's borders. He reported that Ukraine has likely destroyed Ukrainian installations supporting Iranian-designed Shahed drones operating from Belarus. These relay stations, newly established in Belarus, were integral in coordinating and enhancing Russian drone strikes against Ukraine's cities and energy infrastructure, marking an escalation in technological and military challenges the country faces. In his comments, Zelenskyy emphasized that this technology represents a departure from older military assets that had previously been stationed in Belarus. Zelenskyy highlighted the pivotal role of these relay stations in drone operations, noting they allow for mid-flight adjustments and more accurate targeting of Ukrainian sites. This level of operational capability signifies a new military cooperation model between Belarus and Russia, raising concerns about further Belarusian integration into Russian military strategies. He underscored the changed narrative from Belarusian leadership, where it was once claimed that events were beyond their control. Now, with such technology and installations within Belarus, the responsibility is squarely on Belarusian leadership, including President Alexander Lukashenko. Moreover, Zelenskyy suggested that the recent actions taken by Ukraine against these relay stations demonstrate a proactive approach to diminish threats propelled by these installations. Without confirming specific cross-border operations, he indicated that Ukraine would continue to act to protect its sovereignty and infrastructure. He stressed the need for Belarusians to comprehend the heightened risks associated with their government’s choices and their military partnership with Russia, particularly as more advanced weapon systems are poised for deployment within Belarus. This situation also reflects broader trends in the ongoing conflict, whereby advancements in military technology and cross-border military cooperation reshape the operational landscape. Ukraine's military efforts now extend beyond its immediate borders, showcasing its adaptability and the evolving strategic framework necessary to counter Russian aggression supported by Belarusian infrastructure. President Zelenskyy also acknowledged a recent successful cyber operation by Ukrainian hackers, infiltrating Russian drone operator accounts, which provided critical intelligence and monitoring capabilities for the Ukrainian Armed Forces, indicative of a multifaceted approach to the ongoing conflict.

Context

The impact of Belarusian territory in the Ukraine conflict has been significant and multifaceted, influencing military strategies, geopolitical dynamics, and regional stability. Since the onset of the conflict in 2014, Belarus has played a crucial role as a strategic location for Russian operations. The proximity of Belarus to both Ukraine and NATO member states has rendered it an essential launching point for military exercises and potential troop deployments. This positioning has allowed Russia to maintain pressure on Ukraine while simultaneously testing the response capabilities of NATO. As a result, the presence of Russian troops and military installations in Belarus has heightened security concerns within the region, fostering a climate of uncertainty and tension among neighboring states. The Belarusian government, under President Alexander Lukashenko, has aligned closely with Russia, further complicating the geopolitical landscape. This alliance has led to increased military cooperation between the two nations, including joint exercises and potential integration of their armed forces. This partnership not only amplifies Belarus's role as a facilitator of Russian aggression but also contributes to the overall militarization of the region. For Ukraine, the immediate threat lies not only in the direct military support afforded to separatist groups in the eastern regions but also in the possibility of invasion from the north should hostilities escalate. Moreover, Belarus's involvement in the Ukraine conflict extends beyond the military realm. The country's support of Russian actions has helped to legitimize and reinforce Moscow's narrative and strategies, while international responses, particularly from the West, have placed Belarus under scrutiny. Sanctions imposed on Belarus due to its complicity in the conflict have impacted its economy, resulting in increased reliance on Russia for trade and financial assistance. This economic dependency further entrenches Belarus in the sphere of Russian influence and limits its capacity for independent action in the international arena. In sum, Belarus's geographic and political positioning has significant implications for the Ukraine conflict. It serves not only as a strategic asset for Russian military operations but also as a factor that shapes regional stability and international relations. As long as Belarus remains a close ally of Russia and continues to host its military presence, the potential for conflict escalation in Ukraine persists. The ongoing situation emphasizes the need for concerted diplomatic efforts to address both the immediate security challenges posed by these dynamics and the long-term implications for European security as a whole.

2026 All rights reserved