business
controversial
impactful

Coles misled consumers with deceptive discounts, court rules

May 14, 2026, 5:09 AM10
(Update: May 14, 2026, 5:09 AM)
municipality in Galicia, Spain
Australian retail company

Coles misled consumers with deceptive discounts, court rules

  • The Australian federal court ruled that Coles misled shoppers with false discounts.
  • The lawsuit was initiated by the ACCC, focusing on 245 products over a 15-month period.
  • This ruling may lead to significant penalties and calls for clearer pricing guidelines in the retail industry.
Share opinion
Tip: Add insight, not just a reaction
1

Story

In a significant ruling, the Australian federal court determined that Coles, one of the nation's largest supermarket chains, engaged in misleading marketing practices regarding its discount promotions. This decision came amid increasing scrutiny of Coles and Woolworths, the giants that dominate the Australian grocery market, both facing allegations of deceptive pricing and anti-competitive behaviors. The case revolved around the promotion of Coles' "Down Down" discounts on over 245 products, which unintentionally resulted from temporary price hikes prior to the promotional offers. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) brought the lawsuit forward, arguing that Coles misrepresented the actual savings to consumers during a 15-month period from February 2022 to May 2023. Justice Michael O'Bryan presided over the case and found that most of the examined discounts were not genuine, with 13 out of 14 sampled products failing to qualify as true promotions. The judge's key finding was that a product must maintain its higher price for at least 12 weeks prior to a promotion for the discount to be considered legitimate. This ruling not only affects Coles but raises broader implications for the retail industry, calling into question widespread pricing practices. Coles has since stated its intent to review the judgment and emphasized its commitment to providing value to customers while also suggesting that clearer guidelines on price establishment periods are needed to prevent future misunderstandings. The case and its outcomes come at a time when the ACCC is also investigating Woolworths for similar misleading promotions involving 266 products, with potential ramifications expected later this year. Ongoing scrutiny of Coles and Woolworths reflects growing concerns about price manipulations in Australia, particularly as consumers become more aware of their purchasing power that seems increasingly challenged by corporate practices.

Context

The ACCC investigations into supermarket pricing in Australia have attracted significant attention, reflecting consumer concerns regarding pricing transparency and competitive behavior within the retail sector. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has been tasked with ensuring that consumers are not misled through deceptive pricing tactics. Supermarkets, particularly major players such as Coles and Woolworths, often engage in promotional pricing strategies, which can sometimes obscure the true costs of products. The ACCC's role is to scrutinize these practices to determine if they align with fair trading laws, and to investigate potential breaches that could harm consumers or other businesses. These investigations are crucial for maintaining a level playing field and promoting trust in the supermarket industry. One central focus of the ACCC's investigations has been the concept of "Drip Pricing," where the initial price advertised does not include additional charges that consumers are required to pay at checkout. This can lead to consumer dissatisfaction and could be viewed as a misleading practice. Between 2021 and 2023, the ACCC conducted extensive research and gathered consumer feedback, which indicated that a significant proportion of shoppers are confused by supermarket pricing. As a result, the ACCC presented its findings to the industry, aiming to encourage supermarkets to adopt clearer pricing strategies that enable consumers to make informed purchasing decisions. Moreover, the ACCC is also interested in examining the pricing impacts of market concentration among large supermarket chains. The dominance of a few key players in the retail sector has raised concerns regarding their ability to set prices that can undermine smaller competitors. The ACCC has been vigilant in assessing how this concentration may lead to anti-competitive behaviors, including predatory pricing and exclusive supply agreements, which can limit consumer choices and inflate prices over time. Through its investigations, the ACCC aims to mitigate such practices while fostering a more competitive environment that enhances consumer welfare. In conclusion, the investigations by the ACCC into supermarket pricing are vital for ensuring fair market practices in Australia’s retail landscape. By closely monitoring pricing strategies and exploring consumer experiences, the ACCC is working to enhance transparency and promote competition. The outcome of these investigations could lead to regulatory changes and improved pricing practices, ultimately benefiting consumers and providing them with better shopping experiences. As the ACCC continues its work in this area, its findings will likely shape the future dynamics of how supermarkets price their products and engage with consumers.

2026 All rights reserved