Kamala Harris Nomination Compared to Soviet Union
2024-08-24 00:00- The elevation of Kamala Harris is being compared to Soviet Union tactics.
- Critics point out lack of votes and transparency in the nomination process.
- The political move raises concerns among the public about democracy and fairness.
Express your sentiment!
Insights
At the recent Democratic National Convention in Chicago, Vice President Kamala Harris was officially nominated as the Democratic candidate for the presidency, following the unexpected withdrawal of President Joe Biden from the race. This development has raised eyebrows, as it appears to mirror tactics reminiscent of Soviet-era political maneuvers, where candidates were often handpicked without the involvement of voters or competitive primaries. Critics have drawn parallels between Harris's nomination and historical instances of political succession in authoritarian regimes. The absence of debates or a democratic selection process has led to accusations that the Democratic Party is adopting a Soviet-style approach to its leadership transitions. This situation echoes the political climate of the 1960s, when leaders were replaced without public input, suggesting a troubling trend in American politics. The notion of "show" elections is not confined to the Democratic Party, as evidenced by Iran's recent presidential election, which followed the death of Ebrahim Raisi. Observers noted that the real power lay with Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, with only one viable candidate, Nicolás Maduro, emerging from the process. This raises questions about the integrity of electoral systems in both the U.S. and abroad. As the Democratic National Convention unfolds, concerns grow that the United States may be veering toward a political landscape characterized by limited choices and centralized control, reminiscent of the very regimes that many Americans have historically opposed.
Contexts
On August 22, 2024, during Kamala Harris' DNC speech, her family's reaction to a controversial statement stole the spotlight, overshadowing media praises and political highlights of the night. This incident garnered significant attention and shifted the focus away from the intended message of the speech. Following this, on August 23, 2024, Kamala Harris took aim at Trump, calling him 'unserious' and vowing to write a new chapter in America's story, presenting a vision of unity and optimism. Her contrasting approach to Trump's rhetoric was noted by political scientist Laurence Nardon, who praised Harris for her moderation and commitment to uniting voters. Moving forward to August 24, 2024, Ruben Gallego's powerful speech at the DNC shed light on Latino voters' overwhelming support for Vice President Kamala Harris, indicating a potential shift in the political landscape. Recent polls showing Harris leading over Trump among Latino voters highlight the importance of this demographic in the upcoming election. Additionally, on the same day, legacy media was advised to shift their attention to meaningful journalism when covering Kamala Harris, urging for substantial reporting over excessively positive narratives. This call for responsible journalism aimed to provide a more balanced and informative coverage of Harris' campaign. Lastly, on August 24, 2024, Michelle Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Hillary Clinton backed Kamala Harris in a historic move to shatter the glass ceiling and defeat Trump, demonstrating unwavering support for Harris in the upcoming elections. The unity among these powerful women signaled a significant endorsement for Harris's candidacy.
