In a recent deposition on December 17, 2025, Jack Smith, the former special counsel, presented his findings regarding President Donald Trump's alleged actions to undermine the results of the 2020 election. Smith testified before the House Judiciary Committee, confirming that his investigation found substantial evidence pointing to Trump's involvement in a criminal conspiracy to overturn the election results and hinder the lawful transfer of power. This session followed earlier public hearings where key testimony related to the events of January 6 and Trump's conduct was discussed, adding pressure for transparency and accountability. The testimony highlighted the challenges faced by investigators when dealing with witness statements. Smith notably referenced Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony during the Jan. 6 Committee hearings, categorizing parts of her evidence as hearsay due to her reliance on secondhand accounts. He underlined that Hutchinson's claims regarding Trump's awareness of armed supporters and his alleged behavior in a vehicle were contradicted by other witnesses, who provided different narratives. Notably, this included statements from law enforcement officers present during the incidents in question. Throughout the deposition, Smith defended the legitimacy of his investigation practices, including the use of subpoenas to collect evidence, even if it involved sensitive data such as phone records from lawmakers. He emphasized that the decisions made regarding the prosecution of Trump were non-partisan and based solely on the facts surrounding his actions. Smith illustrated his points by describing the rigorous procedures followed by his team to gather evidence and corroborate witness testimonies. Following the deposition, the release of both the transcript and video became a focal point for media attention and public discussion. It initiated calls for further examination of Trump's conduct and the implications of Smith's investigation—not only for Trump himself but also for the broader political environment leading up to the next presidential election. The testimony is seen as a critical part of the ongoing scrutiny of the events surrounding January 6 and has sparked passionate dialogues among members of both political parties about the rule of law and accountability in government.