politics
controversial
impactful

Trump claims control over Venezuelan oil funds to advance U.S. objectives

Jan 11, 2026, 1:00 AM90
(Update: Jan 14, 2026, 4:14 AM)
president of the United States from 2017 to 2021
capital and largest city of Venezuela
United States federal executive department
official residence and workplace of the President of the United States

Trump claims control over Venezuelan oil funds to advance U.S. objectives

  • President Donald Trump signed an executive order blocking claims against Venezuelan oil revenue held by the U.S. Treasury.
  • This move is viewed as an attempt to leverage Venezuelan oil resources to further U.S. foreign policy goals in the region.
  • The decision could have significant ramifications for U.S.-Cuba relations as Trump declared that Cuba will receive no oil or money from Venezuela.
Share your opinion
9

Story

In Venezuela, the political landscape shifted dramatically when President Donald Trump signed an executive order on January 10, 2026. This order prevented courts and creditors from claiming Venezuelan oil revenue that is held in U.S. Treasury accounts, as the White House characterized the action as a response to a national emergency. Trump's administration expressed intent to use these funds to further U.S. geopolitical interests in the region. The executive order came amid a backdrop of heightened tensions in Venezuela following the abduction of President Nicolás Maduro and his wife during a U.S. military operation. Trump stated that the U.S. would focus on gaining control over Venezuela's oil production and trade, aiming to stabilize the country while promoting democracy. This is seen as part of a broader strategy given the historical context of U.S. relations with Venezuela, particularly with the significant oil resources at stake. In taking this drastic measure, Trump indicated that American oil companies would potentially invest upwards of $100 billion to rejuvenate Venezuela’s oil infrastructure, which has been deteriorating over the past two decades. However, skepticism remains among oil executives about the viability of investing in a country marked by instability and past nationalizations that have left companies wary of re-entering the market. Furthermore, Trump warned Cuba about the implications of this decision, signaling that they would receive “zero oil or money” from Venezuela, which has been a key economic supporter for Cuba over the years. All these developments emphasize a strategic shift in U.S. foreign policy as it seeks to enhance its influence in the Western Hemisphere while navigating complex diplomatic relationships with both Venezuela and Cuba.

Context

The history of US-Venezuela relations has been characterized by a complex interplay of political, economic, and ideological factors. During the early and mid-20th century, Venezuela was a major supplier of oil to the United States, which created a largely favorable relationship focused on energy cooperation and investment. The US supported various Venezuelan governments, particularly during the era of democracy following the overthrow of the dictatorship in the late 1950s. However, as Venezuela's political landscape evolved, particularly with the rise of leftist movements in the late 1990s, tensions began to surface. The election of Hugo Chávez in 1998 marked a significant shift in Venezuelan politics and initiated a period of marked anti-American rhetoric and policies that sought to distance Venezuela from US influence and establish closer ties with other leftist governments in Latin America and beyond. Chávez's government implemented aggressive social reforms funded by oil revenues and positioned itself as a leader of the anti-imperialist left. This period saw mutual animosity grow, with the US accusing Venezuela of undermining democracy and supporting terrorism, while Venezuela accused the US of attempting to destabilize its government. The relationship further deteriorated in 2002 when a failed coup attempt against Chávez was perceived by him and his supporters as US-backed. This event solidified a narrative in Caracas of US interventionism, leading to escalating tensions and a series of diplomatic incidents between the two nations. Following Chávez's death in 2013, Nicolás Maduro assumed the presidency, continuing Chávez's policies and further straining bilateral relations. As Venezuela sank deeper into economic crisis, marked by hyperinflation, shortages of basic goods, and widespread social unrest, the US increased its criticism of the Maduro regime. The US imposed sanctions aimed at Maduro and his inner circle, accusing them of human rights violations and corruption. These sanctions, designed to pressure the Venezuelan government, contributed to worsening economic conditions and further polarized the political climate, leading to a humanitarian crisis characterized by mass migration and a refugee crisis in the region. The recent years have seen attempts by the US to engage with the Venezuelan opposition, notably supporting Juan Guaidó’s claim to the presidency in 2019. While these efforts received varying levels of support from other countries and resulted in some diplomatic recognition, the US strategy has not achieved a regime change. As of January 2026, the relationship remains contentious, characterized by economic sanctions, diplomatic isolation for the Maduro government, and continued rhetoric from both sides. Understanding this relationship is crucial, as it exemplifies broader themes in US foreign policy, the impact of local ideologies on international relations, and the interplay of global economic interests in a volatile region.

2026 All rights reserved