politics
controversial
provocative

Sabrina Carpenter condemns White House for using her music

Dec 2, 2025, 1:00 AM50
(Update: Dec 3, 2025, 5:46 PM)
American singer and actress
president of the United States from 2017 to 2021

Sabrina Carpenter condemns White House for using her music

  • Sabrina Carpenter criticized the White House for using her song 'Juno' in a video supporting immigration policy.
  • The publisher Kids Can Press condemned a manipulated image of Franklin the Turtle used by the Trump administration.
  • These incidents reflect a growing concern among artists regarding unauthorized use of their creative works for political purposes.
Share opinion
Tip: Add insight, not just a reaction
5

Story

In recent events, pop singer Sabrina Carpenter voiced her outrage against the White House for using her song 'Juno' in a video that depicted controversial immigration policies. This incident occurred on a Tuesday, and Carpenter criticized the use of her music to benefit what she termed an 'inhumane agenda.' The social media post featured a clip of her song, including lyrics that Carpenter found inappropriate for the context of the video. Her reaction is part of a broader trend where creators and artists publicly object to their intellectual property being used without consent in politically charged contexts. Meanwhile, the publisher of the beloved children's character Franklin the Turtle also expressed disapproval over the Trump administration's use of their imagery. A recent post by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth depicted Franklin in a violent manner, aiming a bazooka at boats under the misleading title 'Franklin Targets Narco Terrorists.' The publisher, Kids Can Press, condemned this unauthorized representation, affirming Franklin's values of kindness and empathy, in stark contrast to the violent imagery used. This isn't the first time the Trump administration has faced backlash for using copyrighted music and characters without permission. Just the day before Carpenter's comments, the Department of Homeland Security had used imagery and music from the Pokémon franchise in a similar social media post. Nintendo, the owner of the Pokémon intellectual property, made it clear that they had not approved such use and disassociated themselves from the content. Other artists, including Olivia Rodrigo and MGMT, have also brought attention to similar unauthorized uses of their music, demanding that their work not be used to promote ideologies they oppose. These actions by artists and publishers highlight a growing concern among creators about their rights and the appropriation of their work in political narratives. They argue that using their intellectual property in ways that contradict their values undermines the intention behind the art and diminishes its cultural significance. As these incidents accumulate, they invite broader conversations about consent, representation, and the responsibilities of those in power to respect artistic expression.

Context

The unauthorized use of artists' work has become an increasingly pressing issue in the digital age, where access to creative content is more widespread than ever. As technological advancements facilitate the dissemination and reproduction of artistic material, artists often find their creations replicated without permission or compensation. Such unauthorized use not only undermines the financial viability of artists but also raises ethical concerns about the respect for intellectual property. Addressing these concerns requires a balanced approach that recognizes the rights of creators while fostering a culture of respect for their contributions to society. Artists usually respond to unauthorized use of their work in several ways, ranging from passive acceptance to proactive legal action. Many artists may initially feel helpless in protecting their work due to the complexities of copyright law and the resources required to pursue legal remedies. Some may choose to publicly call Attention to the misuse of their work through social media or other platforms. This kind of exposure can lead to public support and pressure on the offending party to remove the unauthorized content or provide proper attribution and compensation. In recent years, there has been a growing movement among artists to empower themselves through the use of technology and social media tools. For instance, some artists have started to use watermarks, digital signatures, and blockchain technology to establish ownership and authenticity of their work. These tools not only help in proving authorship but also in tracing the distribution of their content on digital platforms. Additionally, educational initiatives aimed at informing both the public and other artists about copyright laws and best practices for sharing creative work can foster a more respectful environment for artists. Ultimately, the conversation surrounding the unauthorized use of artists' work must evolve to ensure that creators are valued and their rights protected. Building alliances between artists, platforms, and legal entities can create a more supportive ecosystem where original work is celebrated and the unauthorized use is diminished. By advocating for strong copyright enforcement and fostering a culture of respect for creativity, we can help artists navigate the complexities of their rights and ensure that they receive the recognition and compensation they rightfully deserve.

2026 All rights reserved