In the United States, the Justice Department has taken significant legal action against California and Virginia regarding their gun control measures. On a Wednesday in late June 2026, the DOJ filed a lawsuit aimed at halting California's newly enacted ban on Glock pistols, which was set to take effect that same day. This law, signed by Governor Gavin Newsom, prohibits the retail purchase of popular handguns manufactured by Glock and similar firearms. The lawsuit also seeks to challenge California's 'Handgun Roster,' which limits the types of handguns available for purchase in the state.
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche emphasized the importance of the Second Amendment, stating that it is a fundamental right for all Americans, including those in California. He argued that the state cannot impose a ban on the most popular type of handgun in the country, asserting that the DOJ will work to protect the rights of lawful gun owners. The lawsuit follows a broader trend of legal challenges against state-level gun control measures, particularly in light of recent Supreme Court rulings that affirm the right to carry handguns in public.
In addition to the California lawsuit, the DOJ also filed a separate lawsuit against Virginia and its State Police over a ban on high-capacity semiautomatic weapons, including the AR-15 rifle. This action was prompted by a promise made by Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon to Governor Abigail Spanberger, indicating that the DOJ would take legal action if the ban was enacted. Dhillon reiterated that law-abiding citizens should not face criminal penalties for exercising their Second Amendment rights.
The lawsuits reflect ongoing tensions between federal and state governments regarding gun control policies. California has long been known for its stringent gun laws, which proponents argue are necessary for public safety. However, critics, including the DOJ, contend that such laws infringe upon constitutional rights. The outcome of these lawsuits could have significant implications for gun ownership and regulation in both states, as well as potentially influencing similar legal battles across the country.