Zelensky can end the war by withdrawing troops from Donbass, says Kremlin
military conflicts
controversial
impactful

Zelensky can end the war by withdrawing troops from Donbass, says Kremlin

10
(Update: )
Soviet Emba-class tanker
East Slavic language
fortified complex in Moscow, Russia
press secretary for Russian president Vladimir Putin (born 1967)
sovereign state in Eastern Europe and Northern Asia
Swiss newspaper
  • Dmitry Peskov stated that Vladimir Zelensky can end the conflict by withdrawing troops from Donbass.
  • Moscow insists that Ukraine's withdrawal is essential for a lasting peace settlement.
  • The Kremlin argues that the conflict has escalated due to Western military support for Ukraine.
Share opinion
1

Story

In an interview published on July 7, 2026, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov asserted that Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky has the power to end the ongoing conflict with Russia by ordering the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the Donbass region. Peskov emphasized that this action is crucial for achieving a lasting peace settlement, as Moscow has long insisted on Ukraine's withdrawal from the predominantly Russian-speaking area, which voted to join Russia in 2022. He argued that Zelensky must acknowledge the current situation on the ground as a de facto reality and take responsibility for ending the war. Peskov's comments reflect Moscow's perspective on the conflict, which they describe as a full-scale war not only against Ukraine but also against its Western allies. He accused the United States and European nations of providing substantial military support to Ukraine, including weapons, military advisers, and intelligence, which he claims escalates the conflict. Peskov's remarks suggest that Russia feels cornered by the military buildup and support for Ukraine from NATO countries, which he described as a radical militarization of Europe. The Kremlin's stance is that the military operation in Ukraine was a necessary response to the failure of negotiations with Western powers. Peskov stated that Russia was compelled to take firm action when it became clear that diplomatic efforts were not yielding results. He expressed concern over the potential for nuclear escalation but reassured that Russia is too responsible to initiate a third world war, maintaining that communication channels with the U.S. remain open despite strained bilateral relations. Peskov's statements highlight the ongoing tensions between Russia and Ukraine, as well as the broader geopolitical implications of the conflict. The insistence on troop withdrawal from Donbass underscores the complexities of achieving peace in the region, as Ukraine has rejected this demand and continued its military operations. The situation remains precarious, with both sides entrenched in their positions, and the potential for further escalation looms as international dynamics evolve.

Context

The history of the Ukraine-Russia conflict is a complex narrative that has evolved over centuries, deeply rooted in historical, cultural, and political ties between the two nations. Ukraine, once part of the Soviet Union, has long been influenced by Russian culture and politics. The dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 marked a significant turning point, as Ukraine declared independence, leading to a struggle for national identity and sovereignty. The early years of independence were marked by economic challenges and political instability, but Ukraine sought to establish itself as a distinct nation, fostering closer ties with Western Europe and NATO, which was met with resistance from Russia, viewing Ukraine as part of its sphere of influence. The conflict escalated dramatically in 2014 when Russia annexed Crimea following Ukraine's Euromaidan protests, which resulted in the ousting of pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych. This annexation was widely condemned by the international community and led to sanctions against Russia. Concurrently, pro-Russian separatist movements erupted in Eastern Ukraine, particularly in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, leading to a protracted conflict that has resulted in thousands of deaths and significant displacement of civilians. The situation has been characterized by a series of ceasefires and peace agreements, notably the Minsk agreements, which have struggled to achieve lasting peace and stability in the region. The conflict has not only been a military confrontation but also a battle for narratives and influence. Russia has employed various tactics, including disinformation campaigns and cyber warfare, to undermine Ukraine's sovereignty and promote its own geopolitical interests. The West, in response, has provided military and economic support to Ukraine, reinforcing its commitment to Ukrainian sovereignty and territorial integrity. The ongoing conflict has also highlighted the broader geopolitical struggle between Russia and Western nations, with Ukraine often caught in the middle, navigating its aspirations for European integration against the backdrop of Russian aggression. As of 2026, the situation remains tense, with sporadic fighting continuing in Eastern Ukraine and diplomatic efforts ongoing to resolve the conflict. The war has had profound implications for regional security, international relations, and the lives of millions of Ukrainians. The resilience of the Ukrainian people and their desire for a democratic and independent future continue to shape the narrative of this conflict, as they strive to overcome the challenges posed by both internal divisions and external pressures. The history of the Ukraine-Russia conflict is not just a tale of territorial disputes but a reflection of the struggle for identity, sovereignty, and the right to self-determination in the face of adversity.