In recent military operations in Iran, a senior military intelligence official of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) was killed during strikes on Tehran. The attacks have been confirmed by both Israeli officials and Iranian state media, which reported a total of 13 deaths as a result of the strikes on the outskirts of Tehran. President Trump's administration has been under scrutiny following these actions, leading to discussions on whether these strikes violate international law. The Geneva Conventions and the Pentagon's Law of War Manual stipulate that attacks must not target non-military objectives, including vital civilian infrastructure. Senator Elissa Slotkin criticized the President’s threats on social media, labeling them as a potential breach of the law of armed conflict, particularly given the indiscriminate nature of attacks on civilian infrastructure like bridges and power plants. Slotkin pointed out the contradiction in claims that the war is meant to support the Iranian populace while simultaneously causing civilian deaths. The debate over what constitutes a legitimate military target has also surfaced, with some arguing that not every attack on infrastructure should automatically be considered illegal without an assessment of its military role and the measures taken to minimize civilian harm. The situation intensified with the posting of images by Trump that hinted at further military action, including attacks on specific targets like bridges near Tehran. The White House has maintained that U.S. forces will comply with the law during military operations. However, the context surrounding these strikes has raised alarms among international law experts. In an open letter, more than 100 of them termed the opening strikes on February 28 a clear violation of the United Nations Charter, expressing concern that ongoing military actions might lead to breaches of international humanitarian law and potential war crimes. The confluence of military operations, combined with the political implications of Trump’s actions on social media, has created a challenging landscape for U.S. foreign policy in the region. Notably, these military escalations coincide with domestic political shifts in the U.S. with an immediate concern for the civilian toll, which has reportedly reached at least 163 casualties. As the situation develops, both international and legal experts are advocating for adherence to laws governing armed conflict, emphasizing the necessity of protecting civilian lives and infrastructure during military operations.