business
controversial
informative

Worker dismissed for side business after Fair Work Commission ruling

Feb 17, 2026, 2:22 PM10
(Update: Feb 17, 2026, 2:22 PM)
country in Oceania
Australian national workplace relations tribunal

Worker dismissed for side business after Fair Work Commission ruling

  • The Fair Work Commission determined that the worker's dismissal was justified due to the nature of their side business.
  • The employee was found to be using work hours for their side hustle, which conflicted with their main job responsibilities.
  • The ruling emphasizes the importance of employee transparency and the need for clear employer policies regarding secondary work.
Share opinion
Tip: Add insight, not just a reaction
1

Story

In Australia, a recent ruling by the Fair Work Commission addressed a case involving an employee dismissed due to their side hustle. The worker argued that their termination was unfair, as they had disclosed their side business to their employer. However, the Commission found the dismissal to be justified. The ruling presented two primary reasons: first, the employee's side business operated in the same sector as their main job, raising concerns about conflicts of interest. Second, the investigation revealed that the employee was using work hours meant for their primary employment to manage their side business responsibilities. The case sheds light on the challenges faced by full-time employees who wish to engage in additional work outside of their primary job. The rise of the gig economy has led many individuals to pursue side hustles as a way of earning extra income. Yet, this development has prompted employers to reconsider their policies regarding secondary employment, particularly when it comes to possible distractions and conflicts of interest with company interests. Many employers have specific clauses in employment contracts prohibiting outside business activities or requiring prior approval for such endeavors. In the case of the dismissed worker, it was determined that running a business similar to one's primary employment can lead to ethical dilemmas and a misallocation of work time, potentially harming the primary job’s productivity. This case illustrates the necessity for clear communication between employees and their employers regarding outside work commitments. Employees should ideally seek permission or clarify any contractual obligations concerning side hustles. As the trend of maintaining multiple jobs continues to increase, understanding the legal landscape surrounding fair dismissal claims will be essential for both employees and employers navigating the complexities of modern employment.

2026 All rights reserved